Skip to main content

English for Professional Development (Health) (4 cr)

Code: KIEN0004-3014

General information


Enrollment

01.07.2022 - 04.09.2022

Timing

15.08.2022 - 25.09.2022

Number of ECTS credits allocated

4 op

Virtual portion

2 op

Mode of delivery

50 % Contact teaching, 50 % Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health Care and Social Services (LAB)

Campus

Lappeenranta Campus

Teaching languages

  • English

Seats

15 - 35

Degree programmes

  • Bachelor's Degree Programme in Emergency Care (in Finnish)

Teachers

  • Matti Mäkelä

Scheduling groups

  • Harjoitukset 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)

Groups

  • EHK20
    Bachelor's Degree Programme in Emergency Care 20K, Lappeenranta
  • KKIE22LABH

Small groups

  • Harjoitukset 1

Learning outcomes

Students are able to communicate clearly and effectively in different generic and field-specific work place situations both orally and in writing: find, evaluate and use information effectively and function collaboratively in international working environments.

Implementation and methods of teaching

Contact lessons supported by materials and assignments through Moodle. The main emphasis on lessons is to practice spoken interaction in simulated situations.

Timing and attendance

Autumn term of 2022. Regular attendance (75%) on contact lessons.

Learning material and recommended literature

Provided by teacher through Moodle.

Learning environment

Contact lessons as well as assignments on Moodle

Student time use and work load

4 ECTS = 108 hours of work, consisting of contact lessons, homework assignments and independent study

Contents

The field of health care in Finland and in the anglophone countries, training and education, job-seeking, work environment, interviewing patients, anatomical words, nursing procedures, first aid, medical terminology and affixes, medication, treatment, instructing patients.
Students may request additional topics to be covered.

Additional information for students: previous knowledge etc.

No prerequisites, teaching at a level of B2

Assessment criteria

Regular and active participation in lessons, all required assignments completed, final tests (spoken and written) passed.

Assessment scale

1-5

Failed (0)

The student cannot convey messages at the required level or meet task requirements.

Assessment criteria: level 1 (assessment scale 1–5)

Grade 1: The student has a satisfactory knowledge of the course content.

The speech is understandable with some difficulty to follow. Transitions are not handled smoothly, and the speech lacks logic and structure. Interaction is mostly missing. The speech is hesitant, pauses are rather long and pronunciation mistakes sometimes make it hard to understand the message. The student uses only basic structures and makes some mistakes.

Written communication consists of simple expressions and there are plentiful mistakes. The language is clumsy, but the message is delivered. Transitions are not smooth. Much of the text lacks logic, and is not in keeping with the stylistic conventions of the genre. The topic is handled briefly and one-sidedly. The text does not meet all the task requirements.

Assessment criteria: level 3 (assessment scale 1–5)

Grade 3: The student has a good command of the course content.

The student can speak well, interacts with the partner/audience and uses means of nonverbal communication. The speech is easy to follow. Transitions are not always handled successfully. The speech is fluent and clear, but pauses, hesitations and pronunciation mistakes may occur.

Written communication is quite fluent, clear and mostly correct. The structures and professional vocabulary are adequate to deliver the message. The text has a reasonably logical structure. Transitions are mostly smooth. Minor mistakes occur concerning the genre and/or style. The topic is handled in the usual way, meeting the task requirements.

Assessment criteria: level 5 (assessment scale 1–5)

Grade 5: The student has an excellent command of the course content.

The student can speak excellent English. Interaction is very skillful, and nonverbal communication effectively supports the spoken words. The speech is targeted, extremely logical, relevant and consistent. Transitions are smooth. The speech (language, pronunciation and intonation) is fluent, clear, accurate and naturally paced.

Written communication is very fluent and versatile. The student uses varied structures and extensive professional vocabulary, making occasional mistakes only in the most complex structures. The text has a very clear and logical structure. Sentences are linked by transitions and the text flows smoothly. The student can deliver the message effortlessly in the appropriate, genre-specific style. The handling of the topic is diverse and skillful, meeting all the task requirements.