•   IoT development environments and systems AT00BY50-3003 09.01.2023-31.07.2023  5 credits  (TLTIICTDD23K, ...) +-
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Jyrki Antikainen

    Learning material and recommended literature

    The learning material is the material found on the internet and the material presented during the lessons.

    Implementation and methods of teaching

    Classes, exercises, group work

    Assessment methods and criteria

    Ryhmätyö, harjoitukset (not translated)

    Language of instruction
    Finnish
    English
    Timing

    09.01.2023 - 31.07.2023

    Enrollment date

    21.11.2022 - 08.01.2023

    Enrolment in Peppi http://peppi.lab.fi. If you need assistance, please contact the student office.

    Group(s)
    • TLTIICTDD23K
    • 07TVT20K
    • TLTITVT20SV
    Seats

    0 - 50

    Unit, in charge

    Faculty of Technology (LAB)

    Small group(s)
    • Luennot 1 (Size: 500.
    Teacher(s)

    Jyrki Antikainen

    Additional information for students: previous knowledge etc.

    IoT:n ja sulautettujen moduuli (not translated)

    Degree Programme(s)

    Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information Technology

    Unit location

    E-campus, Lahti

    Virtual proportion

    5 credits

    Assessment methods

    1-5

    Alternative completion methods

    AHOT (not translated)

    Dates for exams and retakes

    No exam - course work presentations

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2023, classes are held weekly, attendance at the beginning and end classes is essential and at other classes highly desirable. Recordings of teachers' teaching sessions are not made, but rather abbreviated summaries where possible.

    Learning environment

    Zoom ja Moodle

    Students use of time and workload

    Indicative amount of work 130 h, the actual amount of work depends on the student. The required course assignments must be completed.

    Contents

    Working and applying the tools selected for the course. IoT system analysis and synthesis.

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student does not participate in the group's activities or the contribution is insufficient.

    Assessment criteria - level 1

    The group has been able to cooperate productively and document their work and is able to present their output to other students as instructed. The output mainly meets the criteria of the assignment.

    Assessment criteria - level 3

    The group's presentation is clear and logical. It clearly shows the implementation in accordance with the assignment and possible deviations have been analyzed and reported. The group's presentation reflects an understanding of the group's work, e.g. the terms and jargon are correct. Group members also talk about what they have learned and solutions to challenges (reflection).

    Assessment criteria - level 5

    The group's presentation also includes a link to the theory of the course, and you can compare and justify the solutions that have been used in the work with facts. The group has been able to add something extra to the work that they invented themselves. The presentation is illustrative and things are opened up to the listener with examples and appropriate graphs and pictures.