Study Guide

Learning outcomes

The students are able to
- document their work and competence in a visual way
- create a written describe assignments and their working process in a clear and concise way
- produce a visual portfolio.

Implementation and methods of teaching

The course consists of theoretical lectures, individual work, presentations and discussions.

Timing and attendance

Attendance is required.

Learning material and recommended literature

The learning material is shared during the course on the course's moodle page.

Exam retakes

It is not possible to renew the course (there is no exam).

Assessment criteria

Assessment based on coursework, presentations, activity and attendance.

Assessment scale

1-5

Failed (0)

The student will receive a failing grade if the attendance requirement is not met or if they have not completed all course assignments within the specified time.

Assessment criteria: level 1 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Ability to work according to instructions
- Can generate ideas for the implementation of the assignment
- Can identify and describe the main methods of the course in a guided manner
- Participates in a guided learning discussion
- Can search for professional information in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 3 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Is able to apply a wide range of options to his/her working process
- Can implement assignments in a guided and independent manner on the basis of their ideas and develop them on the basis of feedback
- Can independently identify and compare the methods used
- Can assess and justify competence and set objectives for development in terms of content and/or technology
- Able to follow and describe the professional debate in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 5 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Can apply and develop a variety of options in their working process
- Can use what they have learned in a planned and creative way when carrying out assignments and apply feedback received
- Can apply the methods used and analyse their relationship to the task
- Able to assess, develop and extend content and/or technical competences
- Able to participate in professional debates in his/her field

Learning outcomes

The students are able to
- document their work and competence in a visual way
- create a written describe assignments and their working process in a clear and concise way
- produce a visual portfolio.

Implementation and methods of teaching

The course consists of theoretical lectures, individual work, presentations and discussions.

Timing and attendance

Attendance is required.

Learning material and recommended literature

The learning material is shared during the course on the course's moodle page.

Exam retakes

It is not possible to renew the course (there is no exam).

Assessment criteria

Assessment based on coursework, presentations, activity and attendance.

Assessment scale

1-5

Failed (0)

The student will receive a failing grade if the attendance requirement is not met or if they have not completed all course assignments within the specified time.

Assessment criteria: level 1 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Ability to work according to instructions
- Can generate ideas for the implementation of the assignment
- Can identify and describe the main methods of the course in a guided manner
- Participates in a guided learning discussion
- Can search for professional information in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 3 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Is able to apply a wide range of options to his/her working process
- Can implement assignments in a guided and independent manner on the basis of their ideas and develop them on the basis of feedback
- Can independently identify and compare the methods used
- Can assess and justify competence and set objectives for development in terms of content and/or technology
- Able to follow and describe the professional debate in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 5 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Can apply and develop a variety of options in their working process
- Can use what they have learned in a planned and creative way when carrying out assignments and apply feedback received
- Can apply the methods used and analyse their relationship to the task
- Able to assess, develop and extend content and/or technical competences
- Able to participate in professional debates in his/her field

Learning outcomes

The students are able to
- document their work and competence in a visual way
- create a written describe assignments and their working process in a clear and concise way
- produce a visual portfolio.

Assessment scale

1-5

Failed (0)

- Repeated absences from lessons and teaching situations

- Poor knowledge of the professional knowledge and skills relevant to the course

- Absence of key course assignments

Assessment criteria: level 1 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Ability to work according to instructions
- Can generate ideas for the implementation of the assignment
- Can identify and describe the main methods of the course in a guided manner
- Participates in a guided learning discussion
- Can search for professional information in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 3 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Is able to apply a wide range of options to his/her working process
- Can implement assignments in a guided and independent manner on the basis of their ideas and develop them on the basis of feedback
- Can independently identify and compare the methods used
- Can assess and justify competence and set objectives for development in terms of content and/or technology
- Able to follow and describe the professional debate in his/her field

Assessment criteria: level 5 (assessment scale 1–5)

- Can apply and develop a variety of options in their working process
- Can use what they have learned in a planned and creative way when carrying out assignments and apply feedback received
- Can apply the methods used and analyse their relationship to the task
- Able to assess, develop and extend content and/or technical competences
- Able to participate in professional debates in his/her field

Learning outcomes

The students are able to
- document their work and competence in a visual way
- create a written describe assignments and their working process in a clear and concise way
- produce a visual portfolio.

Implementation and methods of teaching

The course is carried out face-to-face and consists of theoretical lectures, presentations and discussions.

Timing and attendance

The course runs for the whole academic year. Face-to-face meetings 2 times per semester. 50% attendance is required for successful completion. Absences cannot be compensated.

Learning material and recommended literature

Can be found on the course's Moodle platform

Exam retakes

It is not possible to renew the course (there is no exam).

Learning environment

Mukkulankatu campus and Moodle platform.

Student time use and work load

The 27 working hours of the 1 credit course are divided as follows: face-to-face teaching about 12 hours, self-study about 15 hours.

Contents

The course focuses on how to identify your own skills and make them visible, both verbally and visually.

Assessment criteria

Assessment based on coursework, presentations, activity and attendance.

Assessment scale

1-5

Failed (0)

The student will receive a failing grade if the attendance requirement is not met or if they have not completed all course assignments within the specified time.

Assessment criteria: level 1 (assessment scale 1–5)

Student is be able to document their skills visually and clearly articulate the main points of the assignment and work process, and produce a coherent visual portfolio.

Assessment criteria: level 3 (assessment scale 1–5)

The student is able to visually document their knowledge and articulate the main aspects of the assignment and the working process in a clear and interesting way and produce a coherent visual portfolio. The student demonstrates active participation and contribute to discussions.

Assessment criteria: level 5 (assessment scale 1–5)

The student is able to visually document their knowledge and articulate the main aspects of the assignment and the working process in a clear and interesting way and produce a coherent visual portfolio. The student demonstrates activity and constructive participation in discussions with a minimum attendance of 75%.