Siirry suoraan sisältöön

English for Professional Communication (5 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: KE00CE75-3023

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika

21.11.2022 - 15.01.2023

Ajoitus

23.01.2023 - 30.04.2023

Opintopistemäärä

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

2 op

Toteutustapa

60 % Lähiopetus, 40 % Etäopetus

Yksikkö

Liiketoiminta (LAB)

Toimipiste

Lahden kampus

Opetuskielet

  • Englanti

Paikat

0 - 70

Koulutus

  • Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Business

Opettaja

  • Hamid Guedra
  • Aria Kanerva

Opetusryhmät

  • Luennot 1 (Koko: 0. Avoin AMK: 0.)
  • Luennot 2 (Koko: 0. Avoin AMK: 0.)

Ryhmät

  • LLTIIB23K
    Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Business 23K Lahti
  • KKIE22LABH
    Kieli- ja viestintäopinnot 2022-2023, LAB

Pienryhmät

  • Luennot 1
  • Luennot 2

Osaamistavoitteet

Proficiency level: B2

The student is able to
- identify the characteristics of academic texts and to apply academic conventions to their writing
- demonstrate critical thinking and find, evaluate and use information effectively
- communicate clearly and effectively in different generic and field-specific workplace situations both orally and in writing
- function collaboratively in contemporary working environments in English.

Toteutustapa ja opetusmenetelmät

Lectures, group work, individual assignments, peer and self-assessment.

Ajoitus ja läsnäolo

Specified by the teacher.

Oppimateriaali ja suositeltava kirjallisuus

Specified by the teacher.

Required:
-LAB Thesis Guidebook, chapters 6 & 7 (i.e., referencing mechanics)
- Stephen Bailey: Academic Writing. A Handbook for International Students. An e-book available in the LAB Primo database. (The required sections are specified on the course Moodle page.)
Recommended:
- https://open.lib.umn.edu/writingforsuccess/
- https://open.lib.umn.edu/collegesuccess/
- https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/writing-in-college-from-competence-to-excellence/

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL). Discussed with the teacher.

Uusintamahdollisuudet

No final exam/no retake to improve the final course grade. The student is allowed to retake the midterm exam once. However, the student should note that retake exam is simply graded 1/5 at best. The midterm exam grade counts toward the final course grade. If the student fails both the first take and the retake, they may still pass the course by doing the other required coursework,.

Oppimisympäristö

Online (Moodle platform), blended learning, in-class learning. Specified by the teacher.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The estimated workload is 135 hours, including reading, coursework, and lectures or other scheduled meetings.

Sisältö

About 3 ECTS is focused on academic practices, especially academic writing, and about 2 ECTS is focused on other professional communication practices and skills, both written and spoken.

- general principles of academic writing, including style, text structure, and referencing mechanics
- generic and context-specific guidelines for academic and professional writing
- various written and oral communication situations in professional studies and the working life
- key terminology and concepts in the students' field of study.

Lisätietoja opiskelijalle: mm. edeltävä osaaminen

Strong English skills recommended. The course is taught at the B2 level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. This is equal to scoring 6 or 6.5 in the IELTS test or having been graded M or higher in English in the Finnish matriculation examination.

Arviointimenetelmät

Midterm exam. Written assignments.

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Hylätty (0)

The student has failed to meet the set course requirements.

Arviointikriteerit: taso 1: (arviointiasteikko 1-5)

Writing in varied professional contexts: The student has met the assignment requirements minimally. Work displays vaguely consistent and appropriate register. Content is vaguely effective and diverse. The text is not in keeping with style-specific conventions. The student constructs minimally understandable sentences. Grammatical irregularities occur often. Vocabulary is minimally appropriate to context.

Speaking in varied professional contexts: The student speaks in a style vaguely appropriate to the assignment. Student interacts minimally with participants. Performance meets few of the set expectations of given assignment. The student speaks in a vaguely consistent manner. Delivery is minimally structured. Linguistic performance is minimally accurate and appropriate to the context. Pauses are rather long and at times pronunciation hinders comprehension.

Arviointikriteerit: taso 3 (arviointiasteikko 1-5)

Writing in varied professional contexts: The student has met the assignment requirements adequately. Work displays somewhat consistent and appropriate register. Content is somewhat effective and diverse. The text has a reasonably logical structure. The text is rather cohesive. Minor mistakes occur in style. The student mostly constructs sentences well. Grammatical irregularities occur. Vocabulary is adequately professional and mostly appropriate to context.

Speaking in varied professional contexts: In most cases the student speaks in a style appropriate to the assignment. Student interacts with participants. Performance meets most set expectations of given assignment. The student speaks in a consistent manner. Delivery is structured. Linguistic performance is somewhat accurate and appropriate to the context, although short pauses and hesitations may occur.

Arviointikriteerit: taso 5 (arviointiasteikko 1-5)

Writing in varied professional contexts: The student has met the assignment requirements fully. Work displays consistent and appropriate register. Content is effective, diverse, and skillfully delivered. The text has a clear and logical structure. The text is cohesive, fluent, and versatile. The student uses varied structures although occasional grammatical irregularities may occur. Vocabulary is varied and professional and typically appropriate to context.

Speaking in varied professional contexts: The student speaks in a style appropriate to the assignment. Student interacts fluently and competently. Performance meets all set expectations of given assignments. The student speaks in a clear, concise, and consistent manner. Delivery is well-structured, intentional. Linguistic performance is accurate, appropriate to the context, and speech tempo is natural.